Digital banking has made financial services faster, cheaper and more accessible across Asia. But a new report from Fair Finance Asia (FFA) and research partner Profundo argues that consumer protection has not kept pace with that digitization. Its four-country study—covering Cambodia, Indonesia, Pakistan and Thailand—finds a recurring gap between financial regulations on paper and the protections customers actually experience, from debt collection and scam prevention to women’s access to finance and banks’ accountability for sustainability impacts.

The next phase of fintech adoption in Asia may depend less on how quickly banks can digitize financial services and more on whether those services can protect people when something goes wrong.

That is the central message of “Empowering Consumers as Partners in Sustainability: Case Studies on Financial Regulation and Implementation,” released in July 2026 by Fair Finance Asia and Profundo. The report examines four markets—Cambodia, Indonesia, Pakistan and Thailand—and looks beyond the existence of consumer-protection rules to ask whether those rules work in practice.

The findings are relevant to banks, digital lenders, payment companies, regulators and fintech platforms building increasingly automated financial systems.

The report follows FFA’s 2024 benchmarking of 15 Asian banks. That earlier scorecard found financial inclusion averaged 5.2 out of 10 and consumer protection 5.5, while consumer engagement and accountability scored just 1.3. Across the four areas assessed, banks averaged 3.5 out of 10.

That distinction—between having a policy and delivering a usable protection—is becoming particularly important as financial services move onto mobile apps and instant-payment networks.

Cambodia: digital lending needs stronger affordability checks

In Cambodia, the report focuses on over-indebtedness and debt collection. Although consumer protection was the strongest overall category in FFA’s earlier scorecard, Cambodian banks received the lowest average score among the four countries examined in the new case studies. The report identifies weaknesses in debt-burden assessments, complaint handling, collection practices and collateral requirements.

For financial institutions, the proposed response is straightforward but operationally significant: systematically assess repayment capacity, adopt responsible debt-collection standards, strengthen complaints processes and ensure third-party collectors follow the same rules.

The National Bank of Cambodia is urged to standardize repayment assessments, cap recovery fees, sanction abusive practices and strengthen consumer-protection oversight.

The issue extends beyond Cambodia. As digital lending platforms make credit decisions increasingly data-driven, automated underwriting can expand access while also accelerating the distribution of unaffordable credit if repayment capacity is poorly assessed.

Thailand: stopping scams requires more than secure apps

Thailand illustrates a different problem. Thai banks scored highest on consumer protection in FFA’s earlier assessment, yet consumers remain exposed to social-engineering scams that persuade them to authorize transactions themselves.

Official data shows the scale of the challenge. The Bank of Thailand’s 2025 annual report says more than 363,000 fraud cases were reported during 2025, with losses reaching 24.57 billion baht. It also found that victims took an average of 19–25 hours to realize they had been scammed and report the incident, while fraudsters could move half of the stolen funds from mule accounts in about three minutes.

That creates a fundamental technology problem: conventional authentication can prove that a customer initiated a transaction without necessarily proving that the customer understood what they were authorizing.

FFA therefore recommends automatic, free security alerts, transparent complaint monitoring and stronger consumer education. It also calls on the Bank of Thailand to address human-facing scam tactics and require education for vulnerable groups.

For banks and payment platforms, this shifts fraud prevention from authentication alone toward behavioral risk detection, real-time intervention and post-transaction recovery.

Pakistan: financial inclusion does not end at product availability

Pakistan’s case study highlights another familiar fintech paradox: products can exist without reaching the people they are designed to serve.

The three banks assessed by FFA scored above the overall average for financial inclusion and offered products targeting unbanked and underbanked customers. Yet women entrepreneurs remained poorly informed about those products.

The report recommends proactive, locally accessible outreach tailored to customers with low digital literacy. For the State Bank of Pakistan, it recommends more outcome-oriented monitoring, intermediate milestones and stronger evaluation.

This matters for digital banking because financial inclusion is increasingly measured by account ownership and product availability. But meaningful inclusion also requires that customers understand products, qualify for them and can use them safely.

Indonesia: ESG accountability becomes a banking infrastructure issue

Indonesia’s case moves the discussion from individual consumer harm to the broader sustainability impact of financial institutions.

FFA found Indonesian banks weakest among the four countries in consumer engagement and accountability. Customers have limited ways to raise concerns about environmental and social impacts connected to bank financing, while transparency around what deposits and investments ultimately finance remains limited.

The report recommends non-judicial ESG grievance mechanisms, greater portfolio transparency, proactive consumer engagement and stronger environmental and social due diligence.

It also calls on Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) to broaden disclosure requirements, introduce independent assurance of sustainability reporting and penalize misleading sustainability claims.

This is increasingly relevant to financial technology because ESG data is becoming embedded in risk systems, lending platforms and reporting infrastructure. If the underlying data and accountability mechanisms are weak, automation can make opaque decisions faster rather than making them more responsible.

The fintech lesson: protection must become infrastructure

The report’s most important finding is not that Asian financial regulation is absent. It is that implementation remains uneven.

That distinction should matter to technology teams. A consumer-protection framework is only as strong as the systems that operationalize it: affordability models, fraud monitoring, notification systems, grievance-management platforms, identity controls, data governance and audit trails.

Asia’s digital-finance infrastructure is expanding rapidly. The ASEAN Monitoring Progress Report found financial exclusion across the region had fallen to 20.77%, while digital adoption was accelerating in markets including Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines.

Growth, however, raises the stakes. When financial services become instant and automated, consumer safeguards must operate at the same speed.

For banks, fintech companies and regulators, the next generation of financial infrastructure may therefore be defined by a less glamorous but more consequential question: Can a customer actually use the protection they are legally entitled to?

That is where consumer protection stops being a compliance document and becomes a technology requirement.

Market Landscape

Asia’s financial ecosystem is moving toward increasingly digital, instant and data-driven banking. Real-time payments, mobile wallets, digital lending and embedded finance are expanding access, but they also create new points of failure.

The Indonesian Anti-Scam Centre demonstrates the scale of the response required. OJK reported that from its November 2024 launch through February 26, 2026, the centre had received 477,600 reports and identified 809,355 reported accounts, with 436,727 blocked.

Meanwhile, Thailand’s digital-payment adoption is among the region’s strongest. The Bank of Thailand said in April 2026 that digital payments had reached more than 700 transactions per person annually, while instant-payment usage had grown to almost ten times its 2019 level.

The market implication is clear: consumer protection must scale alongside transaction volume.

For enterprise financial-services teams, that means treating fraud prevention, responsible lending, grievance management, financial literacy and sustainability accountability as core digital infrastructure—not peripheral compliance functions.

Top Insights

• Fair Finance Asia’s new report finds that regulation alone cannot protect Asian banking customers without enforceable systems for complaints, lending, fraud prevention and accountability.
• Thai banks demonstrate the challenge of digital fraud, as strong technical controls still struggle against social-engineering scams that manipulate customers into authorizing transactions.
• Cambodian lending practices face scrutiny over repayment assessments and collection methods, highlighting the need for responsible-credit technology alongside expanding digital access.
• Pakistan’s inclusion gap is increasingly informational, with women entrepreneurs facing limited awareness of banking products despite improving regulatory and financial-inclusion frameworks.
• Indonesia exposes the ESG accountability challenge, where banks need stronger grievance channels, portfolio transparency and due-diligence systems connecting sustainability claims to financing decisions.

Get in touch with our fintech expert