Independent earners increasingly expect control over when and how they receive their money, according to new research from Trolley. The global payouts platform surveyed 450 freelancers, creators, musicians and contractors across 19 countries and found that payment delays, fees and limited payout flexibility can influence whether recipients continue working with a platform.
For marketplaces and digital platforms that depend on freelancers, creators and contractors, the payment experience may be becoming as important as the work itself.
New research from Trolley suggests that independent earners want substantially more control over when they receive their earnings than many platforms currently provide. The study, “How independent earners want to get paid,” surveyed 450 freelancers, creators, musicians and contractors across 19 countries about their current payment arrangements, preferences and responses to payout problems.
The findings point to a growing expectation for faster, more transparent and more flexible digital payouts.
According to the survey, 53% of respondents are currently paid according to a schedule determined by a company or platform, while only 28% can choose when to receive or withdraw their earnings. Yet 82% say they want that control, with on-demand withdrawal emerging as the most common preference.
The gap highlights a broader issue in embedded finance: platforms may provide the marketplace, work-management tools or creator infrastructure, but the recipient’s relationship with the platform increasingly extends into the financial experience surrounding those services.
For independent earners, payment timing can directly affect cash flow. Unlike traditional employees receiving predictable payroll, freelancers and contractors may manage income across multiple platforms and projects. A delay in one payout can therefore create a meaningful operational problem.
Trolley’s research found that 72% of respondents consider two days or less the maximum acceptable waiting period after completing work. Thirty percent said they expect payment the same day or immediately, while only 2% consider a wait of more than a week acceptable.
Those expectations create pressure on payout infrastructure.
Fast payment alone, however, may not be sufficient. The survey found that 93% of respondents would accept at least some reduction in their earnings in exchange for receiving payment within 24 hours with a guaranteed payout date.
That finding suggests recipients place considerable value on certainty as well as speed. For platforms, predictable settlement information can become part of the product experience rather than merely an operational detail.
The consequences of getting payouts wrong could also affect platform retention. Payment delays were selected by 41% of respondents as a reason they had stopped—or would stop—working with a platform. High fees or unfavorable terms followed closely at 40%. Both ranked ahead of limited job opportunities, selected by 29%.
Because the research was commissioned and published by Trolley, these figures should be viewed as survey findings rather than an independent measure of the entire global independent-work economy. Even so, they point toward an important consideration for marketplace operators: payout infrastructure can influence user loyalty.
The technology challenge is more complicated than adding another payment rail.
A modern global payout operation may need to handle recipient identity verification, tax documentation, sanctions screening, payment-method selection, currency conversion, transaction status, failed payments, reconciliation and regulatory requirements. The recipient, however, generally experiences all of those processes as one question: When will I get paid?
That makes the operational layer behind payments increasingly important.
For fintech companies, this is where payout infrastructure intersects with embedded finance. Platforms are no longer simply facilitating transactions between buyers and sellers. They are increasingly expected to provide financial capabilities—including account onboarding, payment collection and payouts—as integrated components of their core products.
The trend also creates competitive pressure among payment infrastructure providers. Companies such as Stripe, PayPal, Adyen and other payment platforms have expanded their marketplace and platform capabilities, while specialized providers focus on global payouts, tax compliance and recipient onboarding.
The differentiation may increasingly come from what happens between transaction initiation and successful settlement.
A platform that tells a freelancer exactly when funds will arrive, provides clear explanations when a payment is delayed and offers flexible withdrawal options may create a meaningfully different experience from one that simply displays “processing.”
That transparency becomes particularly important in cross-border payments, where multiple currencies, local payment systems and compliance requirements can introduce additional complexity.
The survey’s emphasis on recipient choice also reflects a wider movement toward consumer-controlled financial services. In banking, open banking infrastructure has made permissioned access and account portability increasingly familiar concepts. In marketplace finance, similar expectations are emerging around payment timing and withdrawal control.
The business case extends beyond recipient satisfaction. If payment problems contribute to churn, improving payout operations can potentially protect the supply side of a platform. For marketplaces, that matters because the availability and reliability of freelancers, creators and contractors directly affect the experience of customers who purchase their services.
There is also a lesson for fintech infrastructure providers. The payment experience is moving closer to the front end of the product. Verification, tax workflows, payment status and exception management may traditionally have been treated as back-office functions, but they increasingly shape how recipients judge a platform.
The challenge will be balancing recipient flexibility with fraud prevention, compliance and operational cost.
On-demand withdrawals, for example, can create additional transaction volume and potentially higher processing costs. Faster international payments can introduce liquidity and foreign-exchange considerations. Expanding payment-method choice can also increase the complexity of reconciliation and support.
The next generation of payout infrastructure therefore needs to solve two problems simultaneously: give recipients more control while keeping the underlying financial operations manageable for platforms.
For digital marketplaces and creator platforms, that could make payout design an increasingly important competitive factor. The companies that treat payments as part of the user experience—not merely as an accounting function—may be better positioned to retain the independent workers who keep their ecosystems operating.
Market Landscape
The global payouts market is evolving alongside the creator economy, freelance platforms, digital marketplaces and embedded finance. Platforms increasingly need infrastructure that can support recipients across multiple countries, currencies and payment methods while maintaining compliance.
Trolley’s research suggests recipient expectations are moving toward same-day or near-real-time payouts, predictable settlement and user-controlled withdrawals. However, because the study is company-sponsored, its results should be interpreted as directional evidence rather than a definitive market benchmark.
The competitive landscape includes integrated payment providers such as Stripe, PayPal and Adyen, alongside specialist global payout and recipient-management platforms. The differentiating layer is increasingly operational: identity verification, tax documentation, payment visibility, exception handling and reconciliation.
For GlobalFinTechEdge, the development is especially relevant to digital payments platforms, embedded finance infrastructure, fintech startups, cross-border payments and banking technology innovation.
Top Insights
- Trolley’s survey found 82% of independent earners want control over when they receive or withdraw platform earnings.
- Seventy-two percent of respondents consider two days or less the maximum acceptable payment wait after completing work.
- Payment delays and unfavorable fees ranked above limited job opportunities among reasons respondents stopped or could stop using platforms.
- The findings highlight the importance of verification, tax documentation, payment visibility and failed-payment handling alongside transaction speed.
- Flexible payouts could become a competitive feature for marketplaces seeking to retain freelancers, creators, contractors and other independent earners.
Get in touch with our fintech expert
