Despite a decade of automation hype, a recent survey of bookkeepers and accountants (December 2025) found that just 2 percent of finance teams rely on AI or advanced automation as their primary method for coding and posting transactions. Most organizations still depend on manual rule‑sets, click‑through confirmations, and line‑by‑line reviews that stall month‑end close and increase the likelihood of errors. The shortage of skilled accountants compounds the problem, leaving many firms with back‑logged spend and overworked staff.

Ramp’s Accounting Agent attempts to break this cycle. Trained on millions of historical transactions, the engine adapts to each company’s unique coding conventions and continuously refines its suggestions based on user feedback. The result, Ramp claims, is a three‑fold acceleration of clean‑book delivery and a reduction of 40 plus hours of manual work each month.

Inside the Technology

The product bundles four core capabilities:

• AI Coding – The system automatically assigns general‑ledger, department, class, location, and custom fields to every transaction and bill, even down to the line‑item level on invoices. It learns from the way each client codes and syncs expenses, improving its precision over time.
• Smart Review – All spend is evaluated in the background for policy compliance, field completeness, and overall accuracy. Each entry receives a recommended action—such as “review GL account” or “ready to sync”—so finance teams can focus on exceptions rather than routine items.
• Real‑Time Sync – Low‑risk, routine purchases are approved and pushed to the enterprise resource planning (ERP) system instantly, complete with audit logs that respect each organization’s control framework.
• Accruals & Reconciliation – At month‑end, the engine generates and posts accrual entries automatically, then schedules reversal entries for the following period. It also reconciles recorded activity against supported ERPs, flagging mismatches without requiring manual exports or spreadsheet gymnastics.

A correction note attached to the release clarifies that the term “mart” in the second bullet point was a typographical error and should read “Smart.”

Executive Perspective

Geoff Charles, Ramp’s Chief Product Officer, framed the launch as a response to the limits of rule‑based automation. “Rule‑based automation didn’t eliminate manual accounting — it just made it slightly faster to click ‘agree.’ We built Accounting Agent to remove that layer entirely,” he said. “It autocodes spend, reviews activity in real time, and automates close tasks. Companies are saving dozens of hours a month so they can focus on strategy and results, not spreadsheets.”

Early adopters weigh in

Three finance leaders who have piloted the solution shared their observations:

• Lauren Feeney, Controller, Perplexity – “Velocity is core to Perplexity’s brand. Ramp’s Accounting Agent gives us both speed and accuracy—we’re not choosing between moving quickly or getting it right. The AI handles routine coding in real time and keeps our books audit‑ready, so we close faster every month without the scramble.”
• Jim Romano, CFO, Stateside Brands – “The Accounting Agent is starting to pick up subtle patterns — like when spend belongs in samples instead of travel and entertainment. It’s learning how we actually operate. Once we automate marking transactions as ready, that’s hundreds of daily reviews gone overnight. I want my team focused on the exceptions — not the easy stuff.”
• Neusha Sayadian, Fractional CFO, Valence – “Ramp’s AI accounting has completely changed how we operate. What used to take hours of manual review now happens automatically. I’m spending 90 percent of my time on strategy and growing the business, not in the weeds of transaction review.”

Market implications

The introduction of Accounting Agent arrives at a moment when the broader fintech ecosystem is grappling with the practical deployment of generative AI. While large language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in drafting narratives or answering queries, translating that power into concrete, compliance‑sensitive finance workflows remains a challenge. Ramp’s approach—training a narrow, transaction‑focused model on millions of real‑world entries—mirrors a trend toward “domain‑specific AI” that prioritizes accuracy over breadth.

If the claimed 90 percent+ accuracy holds across diverse ERP environments, the solution could pressure incumbents such as SAP Concur, Coupa, and even niche bookkeeping platforms that still rely heavily on rule‑based engines. The promise of real‑time sync and automated accruals also nudges the market toward a more continuous close, a concept championed by larger enterprises seeking to reduce the traditional “closing window.”

However, adoption may hinge on integration depth. Ramp notes that Accounting Agent is an extension of its existing agents for controllers and accounts payable, and it is currently available to Ramp Plus customers. Companies entrenched in other spend‑management stacks will need to evaluate migration costs, data residency considerations, and the robustness of audit trails—especially in regulated sectors like banking or healthcare.

Competitive landscape

Several AI‑enhanced bookkeeping solutions have entered the market in recent years, including platforms that offer auto‑categorization of expenses or AI‑driven invoice processing. What differentiates Ramp’s offering is the combination of:

• End‑to‑end coverage – From card spend to vendor bills, across all accounting fields.
• Continuous policy enforcement – Real‑time checks rather than batch‑mode validation.
• Embedded ERP sync – Immediate posting with audit logs, reducing the need for manual reconciliation.

Competitors may respond by bolstering their own machine‑learning pipelines or by forming strategic alliances with ERP vendors to embed AI deeper into core financial modules.

Analyst view

Industry analysts have long warned that the “automation gap” in finance persists because many tools focus on surface‑level efficiencies without addressing the underlying data quality. Accounting Agent’s claim of learning from a client’s specific coding behavior could mitigate that gap, provided the model can adapt to the idiosyncrasies of each organization’s chart of accounts. The real test will be longitudinal performance data—whether accuracy improves over months and how quickly the system can handle exceptions that fall outside its training set.

Regulatory and compliance considerations

Automation that directly writes to an ERP system raises questions about control frameworks such as SOX compliance and auditability. Ramp’s inclusion of full audit logs for every auto‑approved transaction is a step toward meeting these requirements. Nonetheless, finance leaders will likely need to map the AI’s decision logic to internal control matrices and ensure that any “black‑box” elements can be explained during external audits.

Get in touch with our fintech expert